Looking Back the Hidden Cons of Payment Protection Insurance

Payment Protection Insurance is designed with a reasonable purpose to help people who are unable to cover credit card and loan repayments in case of unemployment and happening of unexpected events. But the Payment Protection Insurance has lost its glory since it has been mis-sold to huge number of people who are not even eligible to make use of it. A number of banks and financial authorities have been found out by the FSA for mis-selling PPI covers. The competition commission has laid a number of rules and regulations for selling single premium PPI schemes which is similar to that of health insurance.

Recently the competition commission is having a close watch on the placement of the products of PPI and how Payment Protection works significantly. The Consumer credit Act 2006 made it clear that consumers could now challenge the validity of credit agreements if they were found to be unfair. This applies to any of the following like Secured Loans, Unsecured loans, Car Loans, Home Improvement loans, Credit or Store cards. In fact any credit card or loan that has a balance of £2,000 or over can be audited by a panel of solicitors to see if you have a claim.

The Consumer Credit Act of 1974 was introduced to protect Consumers from financial mis-selling. However, the legislation was unclear and it is now found that many agreements may not have complied with the Act and this could render them unenforceable, even in a court of law. Payment Protection Insurance has got into lot of controversies recently about whether or not it’s worth having, and while this is understandable it is something that shouldn’t be necessarily ruled out. People who are seeking debt advice after being mis-sold payment protection insurance (PPI) are being given more time to register their complaints.

The Financial Services Authority (FSA) has acted due to its own plans to revamp the way firms need to deal with new PPI complaints. Payment Protection Insurance is meant to help people who are suddenly unable to pay back previous personal debt due to unexpected circumstances, such as unemployment or long-term illness. In the most recent statistics from the Financial Ombudsman Service (FOS), PPI complaints made up nearly a third of the total for 2009-10. This is largely due to the FSA ordering firms to reopen previously dismissed cases in September of last year. The temporary rule only applies to people whose complaints were rejected between the end of November 2009 and the end of April 2010. For those who saw their complaints rejected before then, seeking professional debt advice may be the best option to solve their financial problems.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *